Faith
About this blog
Thinking the Faith, Praying the Faith, Living the Faith is written by the PC(USA) Office of Theology and Worship.
Thinking, praying, and living the faith is at the core of ministry in the Office of Theology and Worship. In the following videos, learn more about what thinking, praying, and living the faith means to the leadership of the Office of Theology and Worship. Discover why it matters and what difference it makes in our lives, work, and worship.
Charles Wiley
Barry Ensign-George
David Gambrell
Christine Hong
Karen Russell
Recent posts
- Our Challenging Way: Faithfulness, Sex, Ordination, and Marriage
- Unity, Confessions, and the Book of Order
- Come and See
- Please and Thank You
- Back to Basics on Ash Wednesday
Categories
- Theology (32)
- Worship (26)
- Faith (23)
- Spirituality (13)
- Leadership (11)
- View all categories →
Archives
A Time to Play the Long Game
We have arrived at the moment when our disagreements take institutional form. Congregations are leaving this denomination, moving to another existing denomination, or forming a new denominational structure. Presbyteries are sorting out how to respond, how to be faithful, how to manage faithful staying and faithful leave-taking. Here in the denomination-level ministries folks are trying to discern how best to help us (hard as it is to say who the “we” is as we sort and struggle) live forward faithfully.
How do we do this? How do we live this moment faithfully?
The temptation in this moment, in the heat and hurt and anger of it, is to go for quick, decisive, irrevocable outcomes – to let those staying know that they’ve betrayed and abandoned Jesus Christ by their actions, to let those leaving know that they’ve betrayed and abandoned Jesus Christ by departing from this denomination.
Of course that’s the temptation. What we’re going through is painful. Anyone with any sense of what’s at stake will feel the pain of this moment. Though, let’s be honest, the pain is not evenly spread: in some places it is more acute than in others. Some presbyteries have greater consensus in our disagreements, some congregations have high levels of agreement. But not all, not by any means. The temptation to cut off those who are leaving, or those who are staying, is the temptation to make the pain end now, no matter what the long-term cost.
But in the end the cost will not be worth it.
Now is the time for us to play the long game – those staying, those leaving, those who are unsure. Now is the time to keep striving for the long view. Now is the time to commit and recommit ourselves to deal with one another in ways that both acknowledge the depth or our disagreements today (with all the pain they are causing) and at the same time establish relationships that allow us to rethink things in conversation later, somewhere down the road, when we have had some time to let the dust settle. Let us live our present disagreements, sharp as they are, in ways that refuse, wherever possible, to break relationship completely. Where it is necessary to take leave of one another (and we have the witness of faithful sisters and brothers that in some cases it is necessary), let us seek steadily to do so in ways that establish new relationships that leave us praying for, and genuinely wishing God’s gracious goodness for one another – however differently we may understand what that goodness is.
Why would we choose to do something so hard?
Because of what we don’t know. One of the things we don’t know is what kind of split we’re in. Not all denominational splits are the same. Splits among American Presbyterians have taken different forms. Are we in the midst of a split like those that took place in the late-18th, early-19th Century: Old Side/New Side (1741-58), Old School/New School (1837-69)? In each of these cases the split in the denomination was, with time, overcome. Is that what we’re doing? Or, are we in the midst of a split like the departure of congregations to form the Presbyterian Church in America – a split that appears irrevocable, a split that remains a raw wound in the life of the PC(USA)? Faithfulness to Jesus Christ requires us to do everything we can, “so far as it depends on you,” to make sure that this split is more like the former than the latter (Romans 12:18).
This will require much, including the following.
It requires us to acknowledge that the PC(USA) is and has always been something born in institutional separation within the church and existing to this very moment on the basis of institutional separation within the church. If schism is forming separate denominational structures, then we PC(USA) Presbyterians are all schismatics. Humility is the order of the day.
It requires us to be institutionally and spiritually creative. Our denominational polity and structures are human creations. Our forebears created them, we maintain them. We can change and adapt them to meet the needs of a difficult, unusual, highly stressful time. Ron Heifetz, insightful thinker on leadership, has observed that the question change asks of us is “What should we keep (or preserve)?” What of our polity should we keep, and what alter, to carry the maximum number of us forward together? How do we fashion structures that build bridges that stretch over the chasm of deeply held disagreements? How much room can we give one another? How courageous and creative are we?
It would be good to have a conversation about what it means to be the PC(USA) today. Are we still a “we”? If so, what is the identity of “we,” of the PC(USA)? Why does the PC(USA) exist as a separate denomination?
We have arrived at a moment none of us would have chosen. Where Jesus Christ has been awaiting us. May we be equally faithful in response, as we live this difficult moment.
- Posted at 10:52 a.m.
-
- Tweet